May 6, 2010

it was a lunch break...

...that I hv time to spend for this writing. I m having my tapau-ed lunch the same time I write this. It sucks to note that you have so many things to do, but it ends up you are not doing any of them! well, off course blogging and blog hopping is not one of the lists!

Nowadays I notice that Arissa tends to vormit very easy even during her sleeps. Yes, she laughs and milk during her sleeps too, but vomitting is not something good especially for a growing baby like her. Now I begin to worry that she might be suffering from certain illness. Whenever she coughs, she will throw out. Even if she couldnt belch, she vomits out. Most of the time I would wakeup and change her clothes. Sometimes husband did in anger. I pity Arissa. She whimpers long to cry and my continuous pat on her back just couldnt stop it. Does she feel cold? she refused blanket. But she coughs a lot at night. I put vicks vaporub on her chest and nose, but it didnt stay long. Whenever she coughs more than 5times, she would throw up :-(

This morning during the case management I came accross this file. The defendant has been wound up and the official receiver was supposed to come on behalf of the defendant. plaintiff's counsel had been waiting since early morning for the representative from OR to turn up. we both had to wait until 10.30am and this young guy came with a very confidence look. Since plaintiff already got a leave to proceed against the defendant, so I asked, what would he do, as the defenant's receiver. he confidently said - we received no instruction from previous counsel nor the defendant itself. So I pray that this court strike out the P's case. P's counsel astonishingly looked at me stated - but we have a leave to proceed, the court cannot simply strike out this matter.

plaintiff's counsel was right. the OR is currently the defender. if OR thinks that the case is not worth of defending, then let plaintiff prove it first. if not proven, the case will b dismissd. this OR has clearly missed out his role, but very confident in his view. I doubt that he knew the facts of the case. he came the last minute after being notified by the plaintiff's counsel. well i guess he cut cross the findings of the court. plaintiff is claiming for the reinstatement of his post, as he alleged had been wrongly dismissed. This surely couldnt be possible as the company is wound up. Then plaintiff claim damages for his unlawful dismissal. Now the company has no power over its own assets. receiver will gv priority to creditors, mostly secured creditors. But to such a claimant? I doubt OR would even care to. Nonetheless, it's still too early for us to decide. after all we are not the trial court, r we?

well i guess that's all i wanted to write. this ends up at abt the time i finished my nasi campur. the sambal belacan i took just now has become very hot in my mouth.

No comments: